Blog

Home » AIWS Film Park » AIWS History of AI » AIWS History of AI » The History of AI » AIWS History of AI » The History of AI » The History of AI House » Films for Humanity in the Age of AI – Measurement and Evaluation Framework & Scorecard

Films for Humanity in the Age of AI – Measurement and Evaluation Framework & Scorecard

An AIWS Initiative

1. Core Principles

The Films for Humanity in the Age of AI initiative recognizes cinema as a powerful medium to shape ethics, inspire compassion, and guide humanity in the AI Age. Evaluation is based not only on artistic merit but also on how films embody AIWS Values: peace, ethics, democracy, innovation, compassion, and human dignity.

2. Key Measurement Dimensions and Weights

A. Alignment with AIWS Values – 25%

  • Promotes peace, dignity, and human rights (0–5)
  • Highlights democracy, ethics, fairness, and inclusivity (0–5)
  • Responsible portrayal of AI and advanced technologies (0–5)
  • Inspires compassion, solidarity, and respect across cultures (0–5)
  • Overall alignment with AIWS mission (0–5)
    Subtotal: /25

B. Artistic and Cultural Impact – 20%

  • Originality and creativity of storytelling (0–5)
  • Narrative power and emotional resonance (0–5)
  • Representation of diverse cultures and perspectives (0–5)
  • Contribution to global cultural dialogue (0–5)
    Subtotal: /20

C. Innovation – 15%

  • Innovative use of AI in production, visuals, or sound design (0–5)
  • Creative narrative structures or cross-genre experimentation (0–5)
  • Integration of AI ethics and future-oriented themes in storytelling (0–5)
    Subtotal: /15

D. Global Reach and Engagement – 15%

  • Audience size, accessibility, and inclusivity (0–5)
  • Cross-cultural appeal and impact (0–5)
  • Stimulates public debate, education, or policy dialogue (0–5)
    Subtotal: /15

E. Contribution to the AIWS Ecosystem – 15%

  • Connection to AIWS initiatives (e.g., AIWS Film Park, AIWS Peace Symphony) (0–5)
  • Suitability for recognition as AIWS Digital Assets (0–5)
  • Potential long-term influence on policymakers, innovators, and youth (0–5)
    Subtotal: /15

F. Technical and Production Quality – 10%

  • Cinematography, editing, and sound quality (0–3)
  • Coherence of direction and performance (0–3)
  • Professional production standards (0–4)
    Subtotal: /10

3. Scoring Bands

  • 90–100 = Exemplary – Candidate for Top 100 Films in the Age of AI and AIWS Cultural Ambassadors recognition.
  • 75–89 = Strong – High alignment, eligible for shortlist or special honors.
  • 60–74 = Moderate – Valuable but limited impact or scope.
  • <60 = Needs improvement – Not fully aligned with AIWS criteria.

4. Evaluation Methodology

  • Quantitative Measurement: Weighted scoring (0–100) across the six categories.
  • Qualitative Assessment:
    • Expert review by AIWS Cultural Ambassadors, ethicists, and filmmakers.
    • Audience and youth jury feedback.
    • Case studies on policy and societal influence.
  • Recognition and Honor:
    • Annual AIWS Films for Humanity Awards.
    • Selection for the Top 100 Films in the Age of AI.
    • Preservation as AIWS Digital Assets (Film NFTs) for future generations.

5. Expected Outcomes

  • Establish global standards for ethical and human-centered cinema in the AI Age.
  • Inspire filmmakers to integrate AIWS Values and Innovation into their works.
  • Build a cultural legacy of films that guide humanity toward peace, democracy, and enlightenment.
  • Provide an evaluative foundation for the AIWS Film Park and its role in cultural diplomacy.

Please send your feedback to [email protected]